J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 77 (2008) 044002 (5 pages)  |Previous Article| |Next Article|  |Table of Contents|
|Full Text PDF (221K)| |Buy This Article|

Transition Phenomena Induced by Internal Noise and Quasi-Absorbing State

Jun Ohkubo, Nadav Shnerb1, and David A. Kessler1

Institute for Solid State Physics, University of Tokyo, 5-1-5 Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba 277-8581
1Department of Physics, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat-Gan 52900, Israel

(Received December 6, 2007; Accepted February 1, 2008; Published March 25, 2008)

We study a simple chemical reaction system and effects of the internal noise. The chemical reaction system causes the same transition phenomenon discussed by Togashi and Kaneko [Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2459; J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72 (2003) 62]. By using the simpler model than Togashi–Kaneko's one, we discuss the transition phenomenon by means of a random walk model and an effective model. The discussion makes it clear that quasi-absorbing states, which are produced by the change of the strength of the internal noise, play an important role in the transition phenomenon. Stabilizing the quasi-absorbing states causes bifurcation of the peaks in the stationary probability distribution discontinuously. ©2008 The Physical Society of Japan

KEYWORDS: stochastic process, transition phenomena, biochemical systems, random walk model, Fokker–Planck equation
URL: http://jpsj.ipap.jp/link?JPSJ/77/044002/
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.77.044002


|Full Text PDF (221K)| |Buy This Article| Citation:

References | Citing Article (1)

  1. W. Horsthemke and R. Lefever: Noise-Induced Transitions (Springer, Berlin, 1984).
  2. C. V. Rao, D. M. Wolf, and A. P. Arkin: Nature 420 (2002) 231[CrossRef].
  3. E. Brunet and B. Derrida: Phys. Rev. E 56 (1997) 2597[APS].
  4. D. A. Kessler and H. Levine: Nature 394 (1998) 556[CrossRef].
  5. N. M. Shnerb, Y. Louzoun, E. Bettelheim, and S. Solomon: Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 97 (2000) 10322.
  6. N. M. Shnerb, E. Bettelheim, Y. Louzoun, O. Agam, and S. Solomon: Phys. Rev. E 63 (2001) 021103[APS].
  7. E. Bettelheim, O. Agam, and N. M. Shnerb: Physica E 9 (2001) 600[CrossRef].
  8. G. Marion, X. Mao, E. Renshaw, and J. Liu: Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002) 051915[APS].
  9. R. Abta, M. Schiffer, and N. M. Shnerb: Phys. Rev. Lett. 98 (2007) 098104[APS].
  10. U. C. Täuber, M. Howard, and B. P. Vollmayr-Lee: J. Phys. A 38 (2005) R79[IoP STACKS].
  11. Y. Togashi and K. Kaneko: Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2459[APS].
  12. Y. Togashi and K. Kaneko: J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 72 (2003) 62[IPAP].
  13. Y. Togashi and K. Kaneko: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 (2007) 065150[IoP STACKS].
  14. While the surface area of the membrane is proportional to V2/3, for simplicity we assume the rate of the diffusion reaction processes is proportional to V; this assumption alters just the values of the parameters Di and/or si.
  15. D. T. Gillespie: J. Phys. Chem. 81 (1977) 2340[CrossRef].
  16. M. Assaf and B. Meerson: Phys. Rev. E 75 (2007) 031122[APS].
  17. C. R. Doering, K. V. Sargsyan, L. M. Sander, and E. Vanden-Eijnden: J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 19 (2007) 065145[IoP STACKS].

|TOP|  |Previous Article| |Next Article|  |Table of Contents| |JPSJ Home|
Copyright © 2010 The Physical Society of Japan
Contact Information