J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 73 (2004) pp. 1728-1733 |Next Article| |Table of Contents|
|Full Text PDF (139K)| |Buy This Article|
Transition-Matrix Monte Carlo Method for Quantum Systems
Chiaki Yamaguchi,
Naoki Kawashima1 and
Yutaka Okabe1
Department of Computer and Mathematical Sciences, Graduate School of Information Sciences, Tohoku University, Aramaki-Aza-Aoba 04, Aoba-ku, Sendai 980-8579
1Department of Physics, Tokyo Metropolitan University, 1-1 Minamiohsawa, Hachiohji, Tokyo 192-0397
(Received December 25, 2003)
We propose an efficient method for Monte Carlo simulation of quantum lattice models by generalizing the method [Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002) 036704] proposed for classical models by the present authors. In particular, we derive an exact relation between the density of states and the microcanonical averages of some macroscopic quantities. The simulation method consists of the graph construction by the loop/cluster algorithm and the estimation of the density of states by the relation. While there may be a few variants for the graph construction, we consider the one proposed by Troyer et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 120201]. The performance of the method is examined for S=1/2 antiferromagnetic Heisenberg chain, and compared with other algorithms.
©2004 The Physical Society of Japan
KEYWORDS:
Monte Carlo method, quantum lattice model, loop algorithm, extended ensemble method, free energy
URL:
http://jpsj.ipap.jp/link?JPSJ/73/1728/
DOI: 10.1143/JPSJ.73.1728
- N. Metropolis, A. Rosenbluth, M. Rosenbluth, A. Teller and E. Teller:
J. Chem. Phys. 21 (1953) 1087[AIP Scitation].
- B. A. Berg and T. Neuhaus:
Phys. Lett. B 267 (1991) 249[CrossRef].
- J. Lee:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 211[APS].
- F. Wang and D. P. Landau:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 2050[APS];
Phys. Rev. E 64 (2001) 056101[APS].
- H. G. Evertz: in Numerical Methods for Lattice Quantum Many-Body Problems, ed. D. J. Scalapino (Perseus Books, Cambridge, 2001).
- R. Swendsen and J.-S. Wang:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 58 (1987) 86[APS].
- W. Janke and S. Kappler:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 212[APS].
- C. Yamaguchi and N. Kawashima:
Phys. Rev. E 65 (2002) 056710[APS].
- M. Troyer, S. Wessel and F. Alet:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 90 (2003) 120201[APS].
- C. Yamaguchi, N. Kawashima and Y. Okabe:
Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002) 036704[APS].
- P. M. C. de Oliveira, T. J. P. Penna and H. J. Herrmann: Braz. J. Phys. 26 (1996) 677;
Eur. Phys. J. B 1 (1998) 205[CrossRef].
- J.-S. Wang, T. K. Tay and R. H. Swendsen:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 476[APS].
- Throughout this paper, we refer to the average with a fixed n, as well as the average with a fixed energy, as the microcanonical average.
- O. F. Syljuåsen and A. W. Sandvik:
Phys. Rev. E 66 (2002) 046701[APS].
- A. W. Sandvik and J. Kurkijarvi:
Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 5950[APS]; A. W. Sandvik:
J. Phys. A 25 (1992) 3667[IoP STACKS].
- D. Kandel and E. Domany:
Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 8539[APS].
- N. Kawashima and J. Gubernatis:
Phys. Rev. E 51 (1995) 1547[APS].
- A. W. Sandvik:
Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) R14157[APS].
- N. Kawashima and J. Gubernatis: J. Stat. Phys. 80 (1995) 169; N. Kawashima: J. Stat. Phys. 82 (1996) 131.