J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 70 (2001) pp. 2124-2133 |Next Article| |Table of Contents|
|Full Text PDF (300K)| |Buy This Article|
Stability of π-Phase in Atomic-Scale Superconductor/Magnet Multilayered System
Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba, Ibaraki 305-8571
(Received March 23, 2001)
Atomic-scale superconductor/ferromagnet (S/F) and superconductor/antiferromagnet (S/AF) multilayered systems are investigated in order to clarify the stability of the π-phase where the phase difference of the superconducting (SC) order parameter between neighboring SC layers is π. We clarify the stable region of this phase in the phase diagram with respect to temperature and exchange field (B) in magnetic layers. In the phase diagram, we show that the π-phase appears in both the S/F and S/AF cases. In particular, although a previous work reported that the π-phase is not obtained for any reasonable value of B in the S/AF case where the band structure in the normal state of SC and magnetic layers are metallic and identical with each other, we find in this case that the stable region of the π-phase is as wide as that in the S/F case under a certain condition. We also investigate how the π-phase is affected by detailed band structures and the symmetry of SC order parameter, and discuss the possibility of this phase in the layered magnetic superconductor, RuSr2GdCu2O8.
©2001 The Physical Society of Japan
KEYWORDS:atomic-scale superconductor/magnet multilayered system, high-Tc superconductivity, unconventional superconductivity, phase diagram, π-phase, RuSr2GdCu2O8
- Ø. Fischer and M. Peter: Magnetism, ed. H. Suhl (Academic Press, 1973) Vol. 5, p. 327.
- V. L. Ginzburg: Sov. Phys.-JETP 4 (1957) 153.
- W. A. Fertig, D. C. Johnston, L. E. DeLong, R. W. McCallum, M. B. Maple and B. T. Matthias:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 38 (1977) 987[APS].
- M. Ishikawa and Ø. Fischer:
Solid State Commun. 23 (1977) 37[CrossRef];
ibid. 24 (1977) 747[CrossRef].
- J. P. Remeika, G. P. Espinosa, A. S. Cooper, H. Barz, J. M. Rowell, D. B. McWhan, J. M. Vandenberg, D. E. Moncton, Z. Fisk, L. D. Woolf, H. C. Hamaker, M. B. Maple, G. Shirane and W. Thomlinson:
Solid State Commun. 34 (1980) 923[CrossRef].
- F. Steglich, J. Aarts, C. D. Bredl, W. Lieke, D. Meschede, W. Franz and H. Schäfer:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 43 (1979) 1892[APS].
- Y. Nishihara, Y. Yamaguchi, S. Waki and T. Kohara:
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 52 (1983) 2301[JPSJ].
- M. Tachiki: Physica B 110 (1982) 1699;
J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 31–34 (1983) 484[CrossRef].
- O. Sakai, M. Tachiki, H. Matsumoto and H. Umezawa:
Solid State Commun. 39 (1981) 279[CrossRef].
- S. S. Saxena, P. Agarwal, K. Ahilan, F. M. Grosche, R. K. W. Haselwimmer, M. J. Steiner, E. Pugh, I. R. Walker, S. R. Julian, P. Monthoux, G. G. Lonzarich, A. Huxley, I. Sheikin, D. Braithwaite and J. Flouquet:
Nature 406 (2000) 587[CrossRef].
- A. B. Shick and W. E. Pickett:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 300[APS].
- P. Fulde and R. A. Ferrell:
Phys. Rev. 135 (1964) A550[APS].
- A. I. Larkin and Y. N. Ovchinnikov: Sov. Phys.-JETP 20 (1965) 762.
- S. Takada and T. Izuyama: Prog. Theor. Phys. 41 (1969) 635[PTP].
- C. Bernhard, J. L. Tallon, Ch. Niedermayer, Th. Blasius, A. Golnik, E. Brücher, R. K. Kremer, D. R. Noakes, C. E. Stronach and E. J. Ansaldo:
Phys. Rev. B 59 (1999) 14099[APS].
- A. C. McLaughlin, W. Zhou, J. P. Attfield, A. N. Fitch and J. L. Tallon:
Phys. Rev. B 60 (1999) 7512[APS].
- O. Chmaissem, J. D. Jorgensen, H. Shaked, P. Dollar and J. L. Tallon:
Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) 6401[APS].
- J. L. Tallon, J. W. Loram, G. V. M. Williams and C. Bernhard:
Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) R6471[APS].
- C. Bernhard, J. L. Tallon, E. Brücher and R. K. Kremer:
Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) R14960[APS].
- J. W. Lynn, B. Keimer, C. Ulrich, C. Bernhard and J. L. Tallon:
Phys. Rev. B 61 (2000) R14964[APS].
- J. D. Jorgensen, O. Chmaissem, H. Shaked, S. Short, P. W. Klamut, B. Dabrowski and J. L. Tallon:
Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 054440[APS].
- At T=2.5 K, magnetic moments on Gd are also ordered canted-antiferromagnetically.
- A. Butera, A. Fainstein, E. Winkler and J. L. Tallon:
Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 054442[APS].
- A. V. Andreev, A. I. Buzdin and R. M. Osgood III:
Phys. Rev. B 43 (1991) 10124[APS].
- L. N. Bulaevskii, A. I. Buzdin, M. L. Kulić and S. V. Panjukov: Adv. Phys. 34 (1985) 175.
- W. E. Pickett, R. Weht and A. B. Shick:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 3713[APS].
- This result was obtained assuming ferromagnetism in RuO2-layers. However, the sufficiently small dipolar field is considered not to be altered in the case of antiferromagnetism because, in this case, Bdip should be smaller owing to the cancellation of the field owing to the anti-parallel spin structure.
- As far as we consider the cases of q=0 and q=π/2, we obtain the same results for the model with eq. (eq.2.6) and for the one with the order parameter Δp,z=Δpcos
qz. On the other hand, the former order parameter may give a higher energy than the latter for 0<q<π/2 because of the so-called Bloch theorem which states the absence of total current in any thermodynamically stable state [Y. Ohashi and T. Momoi:
J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 65 (1996) 3254[JPSJ]]. However, as shown later, the region of such intermediate q-phases (0<q<π/2) is very narrow in the phase diagram. Thus, since we are interested in the 0-phase and the π-phase, we consider only the order parameter in eq. (eq.2.6) in this paper.
- We have checked numerically that the pair amplitude at magnetic layers is absent in the case of π-phase, while in the case of 0-phase, it remains finite owing to the SC proximity effect. This means that in the π-phase, superconductivity really avoids magnetism by making nodes in the pair amplitude at magnetic layers.
- I. Baladié, A. Buzdin, N. Ryzhanova and A. Vedyayev:
Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 054518[APS].
- D. A. Wollman, D. J. Van Harlingen, W. C. Lee, D. M. Ginsberg and A. J. Leggett:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 71 (1993) 2134[APS].
- D. A. Wollman, D. J. Van Harlingen, J. Giapintzakis and D. M. Ginsberg:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 74 (1995) 797[APS].
- C. C. Tsuei, J. R. Kirtley, C. C. Chi, L. S. Yu-Jahnes, A. Gupta, T. Shaw, J. Z. Sun and M. B. Ketchen:
Phys. Rev. Lett. 73 (1994) 593[APS].
- I. Iguchi and Z. Wen:
Phys. Rev. B 49 (1994) 12388[APS].
- D. J. Van Harlingen:
Rev. Mod. Phys. 67 (1995) 515[APS].
- H. Shimahara and S. Hata:
Phys. Rev. B 62 (2000) 14541[APS].
- K. Nakamura, K. T. Park, A. J. Freeman and J. D. Jorgensen:
Phys. Rev. B 63 (2001) 024507[APS].
- K. Maki: Superconductivity, ed. R. D. Parks (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1968) Vol. 2, p. 1035.